All comments

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob

The world has moved on.: Re: Guerrilla Worship -... (8 hours ago)

Why YOU Should Plant a Church

The world has moved on.: Re: Why YOU Should Plant a... (9 hours ago)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (4 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (4 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (4 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
Syndicate content

What about the lens which

What about the lens which

What about the lens which says that it is simply a love song, or a collection of love songs, written to celebrate a wedding? There is absolutely no literary or theological reason to allegorize it. Not all commentators have viewed it as allegorical - at least according to my limited knowledge. Origen was at least aware of the view that it was an epithalamium for Solomon and Pharaoh’s daughter. Theodore of Mopsuestia rejected the allegorical interpretation, arguing that it was simply an erotic song composed by Solomon. Luther was embarrassed by the sexuality but rejected Jewish and Christian allegorization. Calvin regarded it as an inspired song about human love. Personally, I am delighted that the Bible celebrates love and carnality in this way.

In any case, allegorical interpretation of the Song of Solomon was certainly not the basis for the evangelical doctrine of the personal relationship with Jesus. So what was?

Am I sure that I am saved? By: Andrew (42 replies) 5 June, 2006 - 11:29