- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- NetherHereAfter on Emerging authority
- Andrew on Private messaging is back!
- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- Andrew on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- graham old on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- shiert on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- Andrew on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
Re: We have to go back, but not to square one
We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew (23 replies) 18 March, 2008 - 22:08
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Jet (26/04/2008 - 03:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Len Hjalmarson (21/04/2008 - 23:38)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (22/04/2008 - 01:39)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Len Hjalmarson (22/04/2008 - 19:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (22/04/2008 - 01:39)
- but not to square one? By: samlcarr (22/03/2008 - 21:43)
- Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (24/03/2008 - 14:07)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: samlcarr (24/03/2008 - 21:21)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (25/03/2008 - 11:54)
- Re: Jesus is not the whole story By: samlcarr (24/03/2008 - 21:21)
- Jesus is not the whole story By: Andrew Perriman (24/03/2008 - 14:07)
- the obligation to object By: john (20/03/2008 - 12:10)
- Re: the obligation to object By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 19:04)
- Re: the obligation to object By: peter wilkinson (21/03/2008 - 11:11)
- Re: the obligation to object By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 19:04)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: randplaty (19/03/2008 - 03:05)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 11:26)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Jacob (18/03/2008 - 23:53)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 00:23)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 10:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 11:42)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 18:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 21:47)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (20/03/2008 - 11:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 21:47)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 18:49)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 11:42)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 10:57)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (19/03/2008 - 00:07)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: peter wilkinson (19/03/2008 - 00:23)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Ilana (18/03/2008 - 23:13)
- Re: We have to go back, but not to square one By: Andrew Perriman (18/03/2008 - 23:59)



Re: We have to go back, but not to square one
While I wouldn’t want to underestimate the impact the destruction of the Second Temple had on the Jewish people, we survived that destruction pretty well just as we survived the first. Jewish history as I look at it certainly didn’t eclipse at that point - it had great periods of flourishing to come, as well as further catastrophes, so I think that part of the diagram is deeply flawed. The other point I would make is that Christians are most certainly being persecuted in almost every country where they/we are present. So for a theology that makes sense in our present context,surely we need a global perspective of understanding how God is working presently in history, not a Western one? It may be that we don’t want to re-create Christendom, but that dialogue must happen globally, and we must live with the consequences of what unfolds as a worldwide body of Christ.