- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- NetherHereAfter on Emerging authority
- Andrew on Private messaging is back!
- graham old on Private messaging is back!
- Andrew on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- graham old on Shane Claiborne and the rich young ruler
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- shiert on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- peter wilkinson on Foucault, 'the Gang of Four', and the postmoderns
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- Andrew on College professors host viewing of Expelled
- john on College professors host viewing of Expelled
Re: I don’t think there’s a
New creation, Spirit, blessing and kingdom: a clarification of terminology By: Andrew (22 replies) 29 April, 2008 - 18:34
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Jacob (01/05/2008 - 15:50)
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 16:34)
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Jacob (01/05/2008 - 16:59)
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 18:27)
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Jacob (01/05/2008 - 16:59)
- Re: Internal politics of the new creation By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 16:34)
- Another nice diagram, By: peter wilkinson (01/05/2008 - 12:18)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 15:42)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: peter wilkinson (01/05/2008 - 16:10)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 16:56)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: peter wilkinson (01/05/2008 - 17:41)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 16:56)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: peter wilkinson (01/05/2008 - 16:10)
- Re: Another nice diagram, By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 15:42)
- "The foundational calling By: john doyle (01/05/2008 - 01:58)
- Blessing and image of God By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 10:55)
- "Certainly in the By: john doyle (01/05/2008 - 12:52)
- I don’t think there’s a By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 14:56)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (01/05/2008 - 18:51)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (02/05/2008 - 09:08)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (02/05/2008 - 16:41)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (03/05/2008 - 13:48)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (03/05/2008 - 17:24)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (03/05/2008 - 21:23)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (04/05/2008 - 19:18)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (05/05/2008 - 11:53)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (04/05/2008 - 19:18)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (03/05/2008 - 21:23)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (03/05/2008 - 17:24)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (03/05/2008 - 13:48)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (02/05/2008 - 16:41)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 18:54)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: peter wilkinson (02/05/2008 - 09:08)
- Re: I don’t think there’s a By: john doyle (01/05/2008 - 18:51)
- I don’t think there’s a By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 14:56)
- "Certainly in the By: john doyle (01/05/2008 - 12:52)
- Blessing and image of God By: Andrew Perriman (01/05/2008 - 10:55)



Re: I don’t think there’s a
Peter,
How one becomes a chicken isn’t the farmyard’s only concern. I’m asking whether there are two distinct species of chicken in the coop: the ordinary natural chicken and the Christian "new creation" chicken. Does joining the new flock transform the individual ordinary chicken, or does the individual "hatched again" transformation enable the ordinary chicken to participate in the new flock? This sort of chicken-and-egg distinction is not my focus. I want to understand what difference there is between ordinary and new chickens, both individually and collectively. That you insist on focusing exclusively on whether the chicken or the egg comes first suggests to me that you are having difficulty seeing the forest for the trees.