All comments

A non-believer's lament...

Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (6 hours ago)
Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (7 hours ago)
Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (7 hours ago)
Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (18 hours ago)
john doyle: Re: A non-believer's... (1 day ago)
Jacob: Re: A non-believer's... (1 day ago)
john doyle: Re: A non-believer's... (1 day ago)
Tim: Re: A non-believer's... (1 day ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Proposition 2: Ancient... (21 hours ago)
john doyle: Proposition 2: Ancient... (1 day ago)
Syndicate content

Re: What can an emerging theology learn from preterism?

Re: What can an emerging theology learn from preterism?

I hear what you are saying about structures, but in the same breath you are strongly advocating a structure (and even questioning whether one is a Christian if they do not agree with that structure).

Not exactly. I am advocating a belief that belongs to a/the structure of the Christian faith I fear will collapse without it.

Our body is sown a natural body it is raised a spiritual body (1 Cor. 15:35-50). What exactly that means I do not know and do not particularly want to debate.

If you are so unsure, then why are you so sure Jesus rose bodily from the dead? I believe the early Christians looked at Jesus when they looked at their own future, so whether a resurrection happened in the past or not, Jesus is the model to which it must conform.

By the way, good luck on finishing your book.

What can an emerging theology learn from preterism? By: Andrew (32 replies) 4 September, 2008 - 13:51