All comments

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (22 hours ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (1 day ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (1 day ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (1 day ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (1 day ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (1 day ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (2 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (2 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (2 days ago)
Syndicate content

evolution

What evangelicals fight about: creation

The second bone of contention in the much abused skeleton of Evangelical thought is creation. Dickinson and Buckeridge (for the background see What evangelicals fight about: atonement) list the options: ‘Three main opposing views with hot and sometimes harsh debate between supporters of six-day creationism, intelligent design and theistic evolution.’ To be honest, I am rather uninformed about this whole issue, and what I have to say will probably seem naïve and misguided. But I think that there are options available to us in a postmodern framework which, if we could just extract ourselves from beneath the suffocating weight of the interminable modern debate, could prove re-invigorating for the missional work of the church.

Daniel Dennett on The Purpose Driven LIfe

In a quite remarkable video clip the philosopher Daniel Dennett discusses Rick Warren's highly successful book The Purpose Driven Life. Dennett is at pains to praise the book for bringing purpose and meaning to countless lives, but he is unhappy about a number of statements that touch upon questions of evolution and design. I agree with much of the tenor of his argument - I think that the church has to listen to rational criticism and has to find a way to speak reasonably about itself and its defining story. In fact, Rick Warren does a pretty good job at this TED conference of speaking reasonably about himself and his 'success'.

Scientific debate better than theology in understanding God's personality?

I don’t want to see evidence of my wife. I want to find out more about her. Even if she were out when I came home, I might find some dry dishes waiting to be put away, or some clean washing all over the chairs in the living room! These things might tell you something about her personality, though may be less than ‘evidence’ that any particular person lives with me. They are like the glow in our house after she has passed through it.

I don’t see how we can live in the world with God without seeing a similar glow.

God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins

In TIME magazine’s issue of 13 November, Richard Dawkins, a well known scientist and militant atheist, debates the reasonableness of God’s existence with and Francis Collins, Director of the US National Genome Institute and an evangelical Christian. Dawkins wins.

Syndicate content