All comments

Guerrilla Worship - Liverpool Flash Mob

The world has moved on.: Re: Guerrilla Worship -... (17 hours ago)

Why YOU Should Plant a Church

The world has moved on.: Re: Why YOU Should Plant a... (18 hours ago)

Contradictions in the Gospels: Problems or Opportunities?

Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (4 days ago)
Jacob: Re: Contradictions in the... (5 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Contradictions in the... (5 days ago)

Day One: A Sir Toby's Creation Myth

john doyle: Re: Day One: A Sir Toby's... (5 days ago)

A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian McLaren

john doyle: Re: A Generous Orthdoxy - Brian... (5 days ago)

The Lost World of Genesis One - John H. Walton

john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
peter wilkinson: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (5 days ago)
john doyle: Re: Some More General Thoughts... (6 days ago)
Syndicate content

intelligent design

On the Historical Origins of Intelligent Design

Over at the Thinking Christian, Tom Gilson, a proponent of intelligent design, asks: “Who Defines ID?” My goal in this essay is not to define ID, but to inquire into its origins. For Tom and ID supporters to talk about ID in the present, it first had to be possible for Tom to invoke the phrase “intelligent design.” How did “intelligent design” become possible to talk about?

What evangelicals fight about: creation

The second bone of contention in the much abused skeleton of Evangelical thought is creation. Dickinson and Buckeridge (for the background see What evangelicals fight about: atonement) list the options: ‘Three main opposing views with hot and sometimes harsh debate between supporters of six-day creationism, intelligent design and theistic evolution.’ To be honest, I am rather uninformed about this whole issue, and what I have to say will probably seem naïve and misguided. But I think that there are options available to us in a postmodern framework which, if we could just extract ourselves from beneath the suffocating weight of the interminable modern debate, could prove re-invigorating for the missional work of the church.

Scientific debate better than theology in understanding God's personality?

I don’t want to see evidence of my wife. I want to find out more about her. Even if she were out when I came home, I might find some dry dishes waiting to be put away, or some clean washing all over the chairs in the living room! These things might tell you something about her personality, though may be less than ‘evidence’ that any particular person lives with me. They are like the glow in our house after she has passed through it.

I don’t see how we can live in the world with God without seeing a similar glow.

College professors host viewing of Expelled

The academy launches irrational hostility toward reputable scientists who dare to attribute intelligent design to biological structures. 

God v Science debate between Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins

In TIME magazine’s issue of 13 November, Richard Dawkins, a well known scientist and militant atheist, debates the reasonableness of God’s existence with and Francis Collins, Director of the US National Genome Institute and an evangelical Christian. Dawkins wins.

Syndicate content